Back to The Apocalypse of St. John

The Apocalypse of St. John

29. Tertullian and St. Cyprian: Heresy Within, Persecution Without, and the Making of Apostates or Martyrs

A gate in the exiled city.

"And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of the testimony, and they loved not their lives unto death." — Apocalypse 12:11

The ancient Christian writers did not reserve the word antichrist for a distant political monster while ignoring the doctrinal rebellion already attacking souls. Following St. John, they distinguished the final Antichrist from the many antichrists who prepare his way. The final persecutor brings the warfare to its terrible concentration, but the mystery of iniquity is already at work wherever Christ's truth is counterfeited and His members are seduced from the Faith.

Tertullian and St. Cyprian give two complementary warnings. Tertullian contrasts the persecution that kills the body with the that kills faith. St. Cyprian teaches Christians not to be frightened by either threat, because Antichrist may come, but Christ comes above him. Together they show the what is actually at stake: not mere institutional survival, but fidelity unto death.

In The Prescription Against , Tertullian gathers Our Lord's warnings about , false prophets, and false apostles. He asks who the antichrists of every age are and answers that they are those who rebel against Christ. He then states the terrible contrast:

There are, through wilfulness of teachings, heresies assailing ; at the present time no less than in the future will Antichrist attack her by cruelty of persecutions, only there is this difference: persecution makes martyrs, only apostates.[2]

The sentence is not rhetoric for its own sake. Open persecution tells the Christian that an enemy demands betrayal. can make betrayal appear enlightened, obedient, charitable, or peaceful. The persecutor threatens the body from outside; the seeks consent within the mind. One may produce a martyr whose blood confesses Christ. The other may leave a man physically unharmed while separating him from Christ's doctrine.

This is why hatred of is not excessive severity. endangers the supernatural life of souls. Hatred of means an uncompromising rejection of the falsehood, joined to prayer, sacrifice, and true for the person deceived by it. A Catholic who fears bodily suffering but does not fear corrupted faith has reversed the order of dangers.

Tertullian is an important early ecclesiastical writer, but he is not invoked as a canonized Father whose entire career supplies an unqualified rule. His later adherence to Montanism requires caution. can receive what is true in an early work without approving his later separation or every opinion he expressed.

That qualification actually strengthens the site's method. Antiquity alone does not make every sentence Catholic. The words above are admitted because their source and context are known, because they faithfully develop the apostolic warnings, and because the distinction they express agrees with 's perpetual judgment concerning martyrdom, , and .

St. Cyprian wrote to the people of Thibaris when persecution threatened. He did not prepare them with dates, rumors, or promises of escape. He told them to arm themselves with the Gospel, the commandments, faith, , the word of God, and readiness for martyrdom. His center was Christ:

Nor let any one of you, beloved brethren, be so terrified by the fear of future persecution, or the coming of the threatening Antichrist, as not to be found armed for all things by the evangelical exhortations and precepts, and by the heavenly warnings. Antichrist is coming, but above him comes Christ also. The enemy goeth about and rageth, but immediately the Lord follows to avenge our sufferings and our wounds. The adversary is enraged and threatens, but there is One who can deliver us from his hands.[3]

The proper study of Antichrist must end here: not in fascination with the enemy, but in greater fear of God, greater confidence in Christ, and greater readiness to suffer rather than deny Him. The deceiver is not the final figure in the scene. Christ is above him, follows him to judgment, and delivers those who remain faithful.

St. Cyprian does not promise that courage will arise automatically when the crisis arrives. The faithful must be “found armed.” Daily , confession, true worship, prayer, fasting, almsgiving, custody of the senses, study of doctrine, and the rejection of smaller compromises form the soul before the decisive demand is made.

In another letter, written amid and threats, St. Cyprian says that must not yield merely because her enemies threaten violence. He writes:

For even Antichrist, when he shall begin to come, shall not enter into because he threatens; neither shall we yield to his arms and violence, because he declares that he will destroy us if we resist. arm us when they think that we are terrified by their threatenings; nor do they cast us down on our face, but rather they lift us up and inflame us, when they make peace itself worse to the brethren than persecution.[4]

is worse than persecution when its price is the surrender of truth, lawful discipline, or Catholic communion. It can speak gently while demanding that the faithful treat as harmless, recognize a , accept profaned worship, or silence the truth for the comfort of a household or community. The absence of visible violence does not make such peace holy.

Nor does firmness authorize cruelty. In the same passage St. Cyprian prays that the threatening men will repent, recover soundness of mind, and seek 's prayers rather than shed blood. Catholic resistance hates the error, refuses the demand, prays for the adversary, and entrusts judgment to God.

St. Cyprian's immediate controversy concerned men outside Catholic unity who attempted to dominate through pressure. Just before the passage above, he asks whether should yield to the Capitol and whether, after the Lord's altar is removed, images and idols should enter the sacred assembly with their altars.[5]

The comparison is startlingly concrete. does not purchase peace by making room for idolatry at the expense of the Lord's altar. She does not permit the language of reconciliation to enthrone what contradicts God. A religious gathering that places the true Sacrifice beside false worship has not fulfilled St. Cyprian's ; it has enacted the danger he condemned.

This principle supplies a grave examination for an age of . Does the proposed peace call men out of error into the one Faith, or does it protect error from conversion? Does it the Lord's altar, or does it remove the altar so that contradictory worship may be honored together? Does it reconcile men in revealed truth, or require Catholics to behave as though God had revealed mutually opposed religions?

The ancient warnings reveal why can precede open tyranny. Souls are first trained to accept contradiction. They cease to hate . They learn to call silence , cowardice , false worship hospitality, and surrender . When persecution finally attaches material penalties to the same compromise, the inward decision has often already been made.

The must therefore fight on the interior front now. Hatred of begins with hatred of one's own readiness to compromise. The man who denounces public while excusing habitual is not prepared. The man who knows every prophetic theory while neglecting confession and prayer has no armor. The man who refuses a false rite but rules his household by anger contradicts the Christ he claims to defend.

The choice is not between doctrinal firmness and holiness. Doctrinal firmness must be lived as holiness: truth with , courage with , discipline with mercy, and public confession with private .

Prepare for persecution by refusing before persecution begins. Know the Creed and the perennial teaching of . Go to confession and guard sanctifying . Assist at the true Mass and never participate in false worship. Pray the Rosary. Keep the commandments. Fast and give alms. Teach the Faith completely to the household. Reject the little lie that promises peace. Pray for those trapped in error. Accept loss rather than deny Christ.

Such a life does not presume that the final Antichrist has already appeared. It recognizes that the contest described by St. John is already present in its forerunners. Every act of fidelity places the Christian beneath the blood of the Lamb and joins his testimony to the saints.

Tertullian warns that can accomplish inwardly what persecution seeks outwardly: the separation of a soul from Christ. St. Cyprian answers both dangers with evangelical armor and supernatural confidence. Antichrist threatens, but Christ is above him. invites surrender, but does not yield the Lord's altar. Violence may kill the body, but it cannot conquer the Catholic who loves truth more than life.

The pilgrim must decide now whether trial will find an or a witness. The decision is prepared in every confession of truth, every rejection of false worship, every , and every ordinary duty performed in .

Continue with St. Bridget and the Lovers of Heresy: A Verified Warning Without a False Date.

Footnotes

  1. Apocalypse 12:11, Douay-Rheims.
  2. Tertullian, The Prescription Against 4, trans. T. Herbert Bindley, On the Testimony of the Soul and On the “Prescription” of (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1914), pp. 40–41. Compare Peter Holmes's translation in Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds., The Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. III (Buffalo: Christian Literature Publishing, 1885).
  3. St. Cyprian of Carthage, Epistle 55, To the People of Thibaris, Exhorting to Martyrdom, 7, in Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds., The Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. V (Buffalo: Christian Literature Publishing, 1886), p. 349.
  4. St. Cyprian, Epistle 54, To Cornelius, Concerning Fortunatus and Felicissimus, or Against the , 19, in Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. V, p. 342.
  5. Ibid., 18–19.
  6. 1 John 2:18–23; 4:1–6; 2 John 7–11; 2 Thessalonians 2:3–12; Apocalypse 12:11, 17; 13:1–18.
  7. Rev. R. Gerald Culleton, The Reign of Antichrist (Fresno, California: Academy Duplicating Service, 1951), pp. 109–110. Culleton is used as a lead; the texts are governed by the identified patristic editions and loci above.